[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Academics for Net Neutrality
Andrea Foster's article The Fight for a Toll-Free Internet,
Chronicle of Higher Education, May 5, 2006, might be of interest
to Liblicense readers.
http://chronicle.com/weekly/v52/i35/35a03901.htm
Thanks to Peter Suber for the tip, and a useful excerpt for
non-subscribers on Open Access News, at: http://tinyurl.com/nuqz9
As Andrea Foster explains, the internet opens up tremendous
potential for education, particularly for distance education.
However, without net neutrality, educational institutions may
face choices between inadequate service, and paying a premimum
for acceptable service. This is already happening, for example in
Alaska where educators whose videoconferencing service was below
par were told to pay more for acceptable service.
As Peter Suber points out, this issue has implications for open
access.
However, the implications are much broader than open access -
this issue has profound implications for education, library and
publishing services in general.
Whether the resources our users are pointing to are
subscription-based or open access, without net neutrality we
could begin to see deterioration in service as more and more
commercial applications beging to use the internet - unless we
are willing to pay a premium for good service.
Picture the implications of sharing current bandwidth with
internet-based television and phone services, not to mention
streaming movies into homes. Scholarship and education, once the
core of the backbone of the internet, could be shunted off to the
slow lane. Or, we could pay a premium - possibly a hefty premium,
considering these commercial competitors - for good service.
The implications are either a future of poor service, or an
additional cost factor, or some combination of the two (e.g.,
paying a bit more for mediocre service, rather than paying lots
more for premium service).
thoughts?
Heather G. Morrison
http://poeticeconomics.blogspot.com