[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Elsevier Web Editions
PRESS RELEASE
6 July 2007
Elsevier Web Editions
The decision by Elsevier earlier this year to withdraw their Web
editions for the 2008 subscription year is causing some confusion
in the marketplace when it comes to determining a replacement
service for single subscriptions to Elsevier journals.
In the old Web Editions a subscriber to an individual print
journal could obtain a site licence for an electronic version,
the Web Edition, free of charge. This electronic version was
certainly limited and gave only one year's electronic access on a
rolling basis. This has now been replaced by one of a variety of
services from Elsevier, none of which are exactly analogous to
the old Web Editions. Specifically libraries face a choice
between Science Direct E-Selects (a single journal title
purchased in electronic format only on a multiple password basis
rather than a site licence), or a Science Direct Standard or
Complete package (potentially a somewhat more expensive option
but with the virtue of a site licence). A combined print and
electronic subscription to single journal titles is no longer on
offer. Libraries must now pay the full rate for both the print
and the E-Select (electronic) option if they required both
formats. This separation of the print from the electronic also
leaves European customer open to Value Added Tax on the E-Select
version which, depending on the EU country involved could add
substantially to the cost (17.5% in the UK, 19% in Germany for
example).
This has caused considerable confusion for both libraries and
agents in this renewal season. The situation is not helped by the
fact that Elsevier's policy is that they will not, in general,
deal with subscription agents for any electronic journal service.
There are some exceptions to this general rule for certain agents
acting on behalf of specific customers in some regions as decided
by Elsevier, but not communicated to agents and customers in
advance. Agents are therefore unable to quote or provide much
information to libraries about the alternatives to Web Editions
other than the standard print subscription.
Whilst it is entirely up to Elsevier to decide how and to whom
they sell their products, the ASA believes that this model is not
helpful to either libraries or agents attempting to renew
thousands of subscriptions at this time of the year and may well
result in the library having to pay substantially more than
previously to maintain a site licence for a single subscription,
or move to a potentially much more expensive package, or even
revert to print only on cost grounds.
The ASA therefore feels this needs to be brought to the attention
of the library community so that agents and librarians can work
together to make the best of what is now a difficult renewal
period for Elsevier subscriptions. We also believe that the
difficulties faced by libraries in renewing their single title
Elsevier subscriptions should be communicated both directly to
Elsevier and also to their subscription agent. In this way
Elsevier may be left in no doubt of the difficulties this policy
is causing and consider revising their policy on web editions to
enable single subscription combinations with a site licence as
well as the other options on offer; and of course for libraries
to choose their means of acquisition using an agent if they so
wish.
Further Information from
Rollo Turner
Secretary General
ASA
+ 44 (0)1494 534778
Rollo.turner@dsl.pipex.com
www.subscription-agents.org
ENDS