|
Yale University Library
Service Quality
Improvement Council
Bibliographic Access Group
Minutes, 19 March 2002
Present: Arakawa (recording), Bouché, Nellhaus
Absent: Crockford-Peters, Richie, Sprague, Swanekamp
OPAC Implemenation
1. The group took a first look at Web Voyage in traindb to evaluate
the revised labels. Some of the revisions had not yet taken place, e.g.
538.
2. The group went over the Web Voyage Label Group's documentation for
the Long and Short views in detail. BAG was working with a marked up
list of the original Label group proposals that indicated which BAG
suggestions and other changes had been incorporated into the list of
label revisions. (Distributed by N. Bouche at the meeting)
3. Instances where tags were appearing under 2 different labels were
noted e.g. field 246. Agreement that Short view should include the label
for Variant and related titles used in Long (there appears to be no
such label/category in the Short view) and include the same fields used
in Long.
4. Agreement that all series displaying in Long should display in Short.
All series linking in Long should link in Short. Agreement to retain
580 in Short view under NOTES and remove from the In: label.
5. Agreement that the label Publications (581) can remain as is, based
on N. Bouché's experience with its use in archival cataloging.
6. Agreement that including 6xx with certain indicators in Long/Short
was questionable.
7. N. Bouché will work on a memo offering a rationale for a uniform
title label.
8. There was reluctant agreement that using the label Description/Quantity
was acceptable for both 300 and 256. (Description is generally understood
in cataloging to be all of the bibliographic record minus the headings
and most of the variant title access points, but it was noted that Description
has been the label in place in NOTIS and that there are elements in
field 300 that are not strictly speaking physical)
9. The NOTIS Webpac was viewed to see if the 511 first indicator made
a difference. Different labels did appear to be in use for videos. S.
Arakawa will check the tagging in NOTIS LTYL.
10. S. Arakawa will check CONSER documentation for guidelines on use
of the Changed back to note generated by 785 08 and the 767 translation
note
11. N. Bouché will prepare an updated response to the Label group
proposals.
12. BAG members are asked to identify any appropriate fields in MARC
21 that may have been inadvertently left off the Label Group list.
NEXT MEETING: March 26, 2002
Recorder: Sue Crockford-Peters
Respectfully submitted,
Steven Arakawa
©
2001 Yale University Library.
Last modified April 4, 2002.
Send comments about this web site to the library web administrator at
Library Administrative Services.
This file is located at http://www.library.yale.edu/Administration/SQIC
|
