|
|
- A. Accession Records and Other Information Source Files - 1. Background Information - 2. Locating Information on Uncataloged Manuscripts Acquired Exclusively Since 1985 - 3. Basic Outline of Accession and Related Files to be Checked - a) acq.tba in DB/TEXTWorks (TS) - b) oldmsacq.tba in DB/TextWorks (TS) - c) YCAL "Bible" - d) Acknowledgment File - e) Dealer File - f) Curatorial Files - g) Bibliographic File - h) ZA Objects File - i) amdraw.tba - j) artstore.tba - k) Art Gallery Survey - l) Deposits - 4. Updating Accession Records - B. Call Numbers - 1. Assigning Call Numbers to Processed Collections - 2. Classification Table - 3. Recording Former Call Numbers in Registers - 4. Special Format Storage Locations (All Curatorial Units) - 5. Uncataloged Numerical Sequence - C. Charging Out Material - 1. General Guidelines - 2. Updating Accession Records for In-Process Material - 3. Updating Shelf Markers and Charge Records - D. Collection File - E. Manuscript Catalog Maintenance - F. Microfilming - 1. Deciding Whether Or Not to Keep Microfilm As a Reference Copy - 2. Updating Microfilm Records - a) Microfilm Retained for Reference Purposes - b) Microfilm Retained as a Security Backup Only - G. Missing Material - 1. During Survey and Processing - 2. After Processing - H. Public Services File List - I. Processing File - J. Publicizing Collections - K. Sorting Folders - L. Student Assistants VIII.A. ACCESSION RECORDS AND OTHER INFORMATION SOURCE FILES Accession information for both cataloged and uncataloged material is recorded in a number of interrelated paper and online files, which extend back to the library's founding in 1963. Additional information for material acquired prior to 1963 may be found in the University Librarian's files in the University Archives (Manuscripts and Archives, Sterling Library). Until 1980, each curatorial unit had its own processing routines. As a result, there is considerable diversity in the content, arrangement, and handling of the early files. From 1981 to July 1, 1985 there were still a number of different paper forms in use even though Technical Services handled almost all accessioning. Since 1985, all new accessioning (including items from the pre-1985 accessioned backlog) has been recorded in the Inmagic ACQ file. Because there was no uniform accessioning practice until the early 1980s, there is not always a single source of background information on a collection to be processed. The general source files outline that follows contains basic information about the administrative and curatorial files that are most likely to yield useful information about a collection assigned for processing. In many cases, these source files will be sufficient. The Survey Checklist of files and shelving locations for the specific curatorial unit will minimize the risk of overlooking essential files, as well as collection material in the stacks. For more detailed information about the history and resulting paper trails of Beinecke's accessioning practices prior to the introduction of the online accessioning system in 1985, consult the Manuscript Unit Head or Technical Services Librarian. VIII.A.2. Locating Information on Uncataloged Manuscripts Acquired Exclusively Since 1985
VIII.A.3.a) acq.tba in DB/TextWorks (TS) Uncataloged material acquired and accessioned 1985-present; also material acquired before 1985 but not formally accessioned until 1985 or later. Notes on ACQ: ACQ does not contain information on materials currently on deposit, only former deposits that have since been given to or purchased by the library. For further information, see the section on deposits. VIII.A.3.b) oldmsacq.tba in DB/TextWorks (TS) Uncataloged GENM and WA material accessioned prior to 1985, and uncataloged material accessioned for YCAL/JWJ between 1980 and 1985. Also includes data from the pre-1980 "Gallup file" of YCAL and JWJ accessions (source files lack shelving location information; some material might already be cataloged). Notes on oldmsacq.tba:
Also dating from Gallup's time. A black binder containing important acquisitions data, information on literary rights, access and use restrictions, and other information. Three copies of the binder exist (two in the curator's office, one in Public Services). There is an online version of the file (ycalbibl.tba) in DB/TextWorks (PS), which has been checked and updated by the curator. This online file is the one that should be used by the Manuscript Unit. As of June 1999, the online version is completely up to date, although the labeling on boxes and folders is not. Search in the Restrictions field for the word "Yes" to obtain the records for restricted collections and for the word "Formerly" to obtain the records for previously restricted collections. Unrestricted collections have the word "None" in the Restrictions field. VIII.A.3.d) Acknowledgment File Filed by name of donor (last name first), and then in reverse chronological order by donor (i.e., most recent gifts at the front of the file). Contains the library's record copy of the acknowledgment letter sent to the donor, plus related documentation, such as appraisals, preliminary lists supplied by donor or others, and legal agreements (if any) regarding the collection. Current fiscal year files are maintained in the Technical Services work area; back files are stored in vertical files in the Wall Street Stacks Basement. See also "BRBL Administrative Files." Filed by name of dealer (all names filed as corporate names, in direct order, even if dealer is a private party; then filed in reverse chronological order by dealer). Contains a copy of the invoice and any accompanying documentation, such as dealer descriptions. (The original invoice, required for payment purposes, is retained by Administrative Services; they handle invoice payments and fund tracking.) Current fiscal year files are maintained in the Technical Services work area; back files are stored in filing cabinets in the Wall Street Stacks Basement. Administrative reference files maintained by individual curators. These files often duplicate information in other administrative files, but they also can have useful additional information. Files are stored in curatorial offices, in vertical files in the north and south bays at the court level, and in the vault stack areas. There is no standard format or content for these files. VIII.A.3.g) Bibliographic File Public information vertical file maintained for the General Collection (pre-1600 and modern), for reference purposes only. Stored in the north bay, court level). A mixed bag of information, but can contain useful historical information or background information on collections and individuals. Reference slips cross-referencing supplementary information in the bibliographic file often are filed with the manuscripts and printed volumes. A card file in Technical Services listing "realia" removed from YCAL collections for separate storage. This card file should be checked when a collection is being processed to confirm that all objects associated with the collection have been found. Database in DB/TextWorks (PS) that lists American art. It was created in a paper form in the 1980s by graduate students from the Yale Art Gallery who surveyed American art in Beinecke and gave each item an accession number; the information was later converted to an online database. This database overlaps to some degree with artstore.tba. Database in DB/TextWorks (PS) that lists oversize works of art identified in 1994, when a survey of oversize art storage areas was completed. The contents are mostly YCAL, but not exclusively. Some information from the Art Gallery Survey was also recorded in artstore.tba, but it is worth checking in the Art Gallery Survey files as well, in case there is additional information there. Much of the material recorded in artstore.tba was removed from archival collections and should be reunited, intellectually, with the source collection when it is processed, although typically the artworks will still require separate storage. VIII.A.3.k) Art Gallery Survey Paper data sheets in Public Services filing cabinets. Created during a Yale Art Gallery survey in the 1980s of all art at Yale University. The data sheets are filed by accession number. Database (in DB/TextWorks TS) supplemented by paper files (stored in Technical Services), documenting current and former deposits. Not comprehensive. The paper files in Technical Services are organized into Deposits - current, Deposits - given, and Deposits - returned. These files originated with records for GEN deposits; records for others are added as new deposits are accepted, or when documentation for existing deposits not previously recorded in the Deposits paper files is pulled together. Database created in 1996, based on survey of manuscript deposits in deposit cage; as of this date (8/97), the database does not include records for deposits of printed material. Curatorial files, and in special cases, the Director's files, may contain additional documentation. VIII.A.4. Updating Accession Records When material is cataloged, the accession records must be updated to reflect the new, cataloged call number. Ensuring that this is done is the responsibility of the processing archivist. Database security procedure, however, may require that the actual record updating be done by others. Updates to the online accession databases (ACQ & OLDMSACQ) are handled by the Archives Assistant, from information provided by the processing archivist. Updates always include the following steps:
In addition to the required field updates, obvious typos should be corrected, and the AUT data should be updated to conform with AACR 2 and the LCAC, if any. The collation should NOT be changed merely to reflect rehousing of material since it was originally received, or changes in descriptive practice over the years. Other suggested changes should be reviewed by the Manuscript Unit Head before being passed along to the Archives Assistant. Eventually, export routines run periodically by TS or Manuscript staff are used to transfer online accession records from ACQ and OLDMSACQ databases to their corresponding archival files, CATACQ and CATMSS. Updates to paper-based accession records (i.e., the old slip files) should be handled by the archivist, in consultation with the Manuscript Unit Head. In some cases, accession records may be created retrospectively. These cases include reconned items for which the library has no readily available accession records, and uncataloged items found to lack accession records. For recon materials, records are created in OLDMSACQ only, to capture provenance information that we do not currently encorporate into catalog records. Such accessions typically pre-date the establishment of Beinecke (1963.) For previously unaccessioned material acquired since 1963, records are created retrospectively in ACQ, according to current practice. VIII.B. CALL NUMBERS
VIII.B.1. Assigning Call Numbers
to Processed Collections
Call numbers for processed collections are assigned from the MSS shelf
lists as materials are processed and cataloged. The shelflists are currently
online, in an Excel file. Numbers are assigned in an "idiot" number order.
Final call numbers should be assigned toward the end of the processing
period, not at the outset. This avoids shelving problems and facilitates
stack shifting while collections are in process. Until fully processed,
a collection retains its Uncat call number(s).
VIII.B.2. Classification Table
A variety of classification (and shelving) schemes for cataloged and
uncataloged materials have been used for Beinecke collections. The basic
scheme distinguishes between cataloged and uncataloged.
An outline of the numbering schemes used over time for each collection
follows. It includes the storage location (STORLOC), either on the shelves
(S) or in vertical files (VF), and whether or not the call number scheme
reflects current (C) or past (P) practice.
As a general rule, obsolete "cataloged" call numbers are not recorded
in collection finding aids, and "Uncat" nubmers are never retained. In
exceptional cases (e.g., Boswell Papers), call numbers of previously cataloged
materials may be recorded in the finding aid, when the older numbering
system was well-known in the scholarly community, and we expect people
to ask for material by numbers in the superceded numbering scheme. This
is particularly the case (though rare) when an authoritative published
bibliography or guide of long standing exists (e.g., Pottle numbers in
Boswell).
If retained, the numbers usually are recorded as a note, under the item
description. For general paging purposes, the standard box/folder designation
is employed.
If older numbers are retained in the collection list, an appropriate
explanation should be included in the front matter.
VIII.B.4. Special Format Storage Locations
(All Curatorial Units)
Oversize:
Previously, when material that had been assigned an uncataloged number
was processed and/or cataloged, a dummy was placed on the shelf or in
the file with the notation that the uncataloged number was no longer in
use. We are not continuing this practice.
Whenever Beinecke material (cataloged or uncataloged, print or nonprint)
is removed from the stacks for more than one day, a three-part charge
slip should be completed and the card stock copy stapled to an out card.
(The charge slip alone is too flimsy to be left in the stacks as a marker.)
If you are removing a large collection, tape a "Collection Removed" stack
sign to the shelf from which the material has been removed. Staple the
card stock copy of the charge slip to the sign.
VIII.C.2. Updating Accession Records
for In-Process Material
When removing material from the stacks for processing, notify the Archives
(Accessioning) Assistant so that corresponding Inmagic accession records
can be updated to record that the material is in process. The Uncat #
is moved to the MEM field, and replaced in the BCN with the code "Mssu,"
followed by your last name in parentheses, e.g., BCN Mssu (Jones).
"Mssu" alone in the BCN (i.e., no Uncat # in the MEM field) is reserved
for those things in the routine accessioning-to-cataloging workflow.
VIII.C.3. Updating Shelf Markers
and Charge Records
When materials are returned to the stacks, the "Collection Removed" sign
or charge slip should be removed, and the copy of the charge slip at the
Public Services Desk should be discharged. Removing the stack signs and
shelf slips is the direct responsibility of the processing archivist.
He/she also is responsible for pulling charge slips from the staff charge
file at the Public Services Desk and handing them to Public Services staff
to be discharged. Do not discard charge slips yourself; these slips are
used by Public Services for statistical purposes.
VIII.D. COLLECTION FILE (See: Processing
File)
VIII.E. MANUSCRIPT CATALOG MAINTENANCE
Once processing is completed and a finding aid is available in the finding
aids database, any corresponding card sets in the manuscript catalog should
be pulled, bundled, dated, and stored in the Manuscript Unit; after 3-5
years, if the cards are not required, they will be discarded.
If you pull extensive runs of cards from the manuscript catalog to expedite
processing, a dated card should be inserted in their place clearly
stating that the collection is in process and the cards have been removed
for this purpose. Refer researchers to the Public Services staff for assistance.
This might include temporarily paging the cards for reading room use,
so they should be kept, whenever possible, in a card file (with a rod),
or photocopied.
Photocopying, while an option, can be quite time consuming where extensive
card sets are concerned. It should only be done when heavy research use
of the in-process collection is anticipated and it isn't possible to maintain
the cards in a file drawer that both the processor and researchers can
use as need arises. If you do copy cards, be sure to check both sides
of the cards in case additional information (e.g., provenance data) is
recorded on the verso.
VIII.F.1 Deciding Whether Or Not
to Keep Microfilm As a Reference Copy
Do a search in microflm.tba in DB/TextWorks (PS) to find all of the microfilm
associated with the manuscript collection that you are processing. If
the microfilm is of a complete work in the collection (e.g., a complete
manuscript of Eugene O'Neill's Strange Interlude ), then the reel
should be kept as a reference copy. If there are other bits of material
on the reel with a complete work, then do not delete that information
from the online record, but do not update the call numbers for those other
items (often, the items are from other collections, which may still be
unprocessed).
If the microfilm is of correspondence or other material that has been
rearranged during processing (i.e., the order on the microfilm does not
represent the current order of the manuscript collection), then the microfilm
should not be kept as a reference copy.
If the microfilm contains a manuscript item that the curator has decided
to discard from the collection, then the microfilm reel should not be
kept as a reference copy. In addition, once a manuscript collection has
been preservation microfilmed, the old reference copy will be superseded
by the preservation copy. However, if there is a possibility that loss
of text has occurred before the preservation copy was made, than the old
reference copy may be kept as well (e.g., the case of Jonathan Edwards).
If you have questions about whether or not to keep a microfilm as a reference
copy, consult the Public Services Librarian.
Those microfilm reels that we do not keep as reference copies will not
be thrown away. They will be retained for security purposes. For now,
these reels will be kept on the microfilm shelves but will no longer have
a call number in the database.
VIII.F.2 Updating Microfilm Records
First, verify that the microfilm is on the shelf, but do not change the
information on the microfilm box. Leave the microfilm in place. If you
cannot find the microfilm, consult with the Public Services Librarian.
VIII.F.2.a) Microfilm Retained
for Reference Purposes
If the microfilm should continue to serve as a reference copy, then update
the call number in the "CALL NO" field. Put a note in the "Notes" field
with the old call number of the manuscript collection, an explanation
of what changes you have made in the online record, your initials, and
the date. For example, "Formerly MS Vault Shelves Romanov. Collection
now processed. MBS, 1998 Mar 31." The appropriate folders and boxes in
the manuscript collection need to be stamped. See the section on stamps
in Appendix A for information on how to stamp the folders and boxes.
If the microfilm should not be used as a reference copy, put "DO NOT
USE" in the "CALL NO" field. Put a note in the "Notes" field with the
old call number of the manuscript collection, an explanation of what changes
you have made in the online record, your initials, and the date. For example,
"Formerly Uncat.MS Vault.462. Previously unprocessed collection. Microfilm
does not reflect current arrangement. KER, 1998 Mar 24."
VIII.G.1. During Survey and Processing
If items appear to be missing from the collection, notify the curator
and the Public Services Librarian (who can check with Public Services
staff), who can try to locate the material, or determine that it is not
missing after all (it might have been removed at an earlier date for legitimate
reasons, or transferred to another collection).
Check the full range of accession files, catalog records, finding aids
database, any extant reels of microfilm and the NOS database, in case
it has been cataloged separately, integrated into another collection,
already noted as NOS, etc.
If a surrogate copy of the item is located (on microfilm or in the photonegative
database), derive a copy suitable for reference use and include that in
place of the original. Mark the copy [we need to come up with a phrase].
If materials are still missing after processing has been completed:
After completing a new register, add an entry to the
using existing entries as models. Use a generic text editor to edit the
file - HTML editors tend to add unnecessary coding.
This list is now used instead of MSSLIST, which is obselete.
The Processing File is created by the Archivist in the course of processing
and retained to the extent that the file is necessary to preserve the
documentation about processing.
Frequently, the curator's file will be the final repository for processing-related
documentation. Consult the curator before retaining material in the unit
as a Processing File.
VIII.J. PUBLICIZING COLLECTIONS
When an important collection has been processed, it may be announced
in one or more of the appropriate journals and newsletters. Publications
include:
Archivists are encouraged to draft such announcements and submit them
to Christa for distribution. They should be cleared through the Manuscript
Unit Head, however, and with the appropriate curator before submission
to Christa.
Sorting folders may prove useful at the beginning of a processing project,
for the preliminary sorting of a collection into series. When using sorting
folders, you can make brief labels as to the contents, or you can put
the original folders directly into the sorting folders.
Before using sorting folders, make certain that none of them have old
labels or markings on them, and that each folder is empty. When you are
finished with the folders, have a student assistant erase all marks and
check each folder for contents before returning the folders to the supply
area.
Archivists are responsible for assigning tasks to the students and for
supervising their work. Close attention needs to be paid to the students'
work so that suggestions can be made for improvement and for assignment
of future tasks. Each task should be clearly outlined before the student
starts work, and the archivist should be available for questions from
the student. In addition, archivists should communicate with each other
about what kinds of tasks prove to be successful for student work and
what tasks need to be explained more clearly.
The following tasks are appropriate for student assistants:
|