Decorative Image
Yale University Library Decorative Image
Research Tools Libraries & Collections About the Library Library Services
Departments & Staff Human Resources Giving to the Library Access & Use Computers in the Library Ask! a Librarian
Standing Committees
decorative image

FOCUS FORWARD

Communication Surveys

January 29, 2003

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

To fulfill its objective to Increase participation and involvement of Library staff in planning, problem solving, and communication . . . , the Microcosm Group requested feedback from the Focus Forward participants regarding communication.  A two-part survey – a Communications Checklist completed by each attendee and a Two-Way Communications Worksheet completed collectively at each table – was created by the Microcosm Group and distributed at the Focus Forward meeting.  Following is a summary of the results of both survey components.

Communications Checklist

One hundred and forty-four (144) forms were completed and tallied.  Of the thirteen (13) Communications Vehicles on the Checklist, seven (7) or 54% were ranked as having a High Degree of Importance.  These items, sorted by the percent of attendees making this evaluation, follow.  Information regarding the Frequency of Information Received is also included in the table.

 

Vehicle

 

 

HIGH DEGREE OF IMPORTANCE

 

Percentage

of Respondents

 

Frequency of Info Received

 

Percentage of Respondents

1

12

Information from Supervisor

72.90%

Often

36.81%

2

13

Staff Feedback to Supervisor

58.33%

Often

29.86%

3

8

Regularly-Scheduled Dept Meeting

58.33%

Often

31.25%

4

11

Information from Colleagues

57.64%

Often

55.56%

5

5

YULIB Listserv

47.22%

Always

35.42%

6

4

YUL Web Sites

47.22%

Often

40.28%

7

10

Tea/Meeting with Alice

21.53%

Sometimes

81.25%

Noteworthy is the significance assigned to personal interactions with the Supervisor, both on a one-to-one basis – Information from Supervisor and Staff Feedback to Supervisor – and in the context of a Department Meeting.

Identical in number, seven (7) Vehicles were considered as Always to Often in the Frequency of Information Received category. The Frequency is noted at the Vehicle-level.

 

Vehicle

 

FREQUENCY OF INFORMATION RECEIVED – Always to Often

 

Percentage

of Respondents

 

Degree of Importance

 

Percentage of Respondents

1

11

Information from Colleagues (Often)

55.56%

High

57.64%

2

4

YUL Web Sites (Often)

40.28%

High

47.22%

3

12

Information from Supervisor (Often)

36.81%

High

72.90%

4

5

YULIB Listserv (Always)

35.42%

High

47.22%

5

8

Regularly-Scheduled Dept Meeting (Often)

31.25%

Low-Moderate

58.33%

6

2

Yale Daily News (Often)

29.86%

Sometimes

50.00%

7

13

Staff Feedback to Supervisor (Often)

29.86%

High

58.33%

Personal contact is also obviously valued as a frequent source of information, as noted in Information from Colleagues and in Information from Supervisor.  These vehicles scored fourth and first for High Degree of Importance and first and third for Frequency of Information, respectively.

Of the total fourteen (14) Vehicles, all but two (2) – Tea/Meeting with Alice and Yale Daily News – appear in both rankings.

Blank spaces were left for respondents to add and evaluate “other” vehicles.  Of the forty-five “write-ins,” four (4) received five (5) or more citations.

“OTHER” COMMUNICATIONS VEHICLES – 5 or More Citations

Grapevine/Gossip (within and outside Yale)

9

Department or Committee Meetings /Forums

6

Interaction with Faculty, Students, and/or Users

5

E-mail

5

TOTAL

25

The top three (3) vehicles repeated the earlier-identified trend favoring personal interaction.

Two-Way Communications Worksheet

Twenty-two (22) forms with 238 responses were gathered from the twenty-one (21) Tables.  (Note that one (1) Table submitted two (2) forms.)  These responses were very diverse and require detailed analysis to identify the most useful.  It is worth noting that of the forty-four (44) responses to the first question – What method of follow-up communications do we want regarding any open issues from today (e.g., the Forward Focus meeting) . . .  – seventy percent (70%) cited three (3) methods.

COMMUNICATIONS METHODS – Responses to Question # 1

E-Mail

16

Meetings (Group or Face-to-Face)

10

Web Sites

5

TOTAL

31

 

/fdimages/pixel.gif 


© 2007 Yale University Library
This file last modified 07/17/03
Send comments to Library Administration
image map of navigational links
Search this siteYale UniversityYaleInfoContact UsOrbis Library CatalogLibrary hours