[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: The Economist and e-Archiving
> Who decides what is unlawful to publish?
Legislative bodies and the courts.
> To archive?
Legislative bodies and the courts.
> About your right to speak?
Legislative bodies and the courts.
> To archive?
Legislative bodies and the courts.
Let's be clear about something here: libel and slander are not civil
rights. The law does indeed limit what we can say and publish, and I don't
believe any thoughtful person would have it otherwise. The question is
whether a slander, once illegally published, thereby acquires the special
status of being part of the "public record" and therefore must remain
available to the public. Personally, I don't think that needs to be the
case, but I can understand arguments to the contrary.
-------------
Rick Anderson
Director of Resource Acquisition
The University Libraries "Perfect clarity is the
University of Nevada, Reno ultimate style. A sentence
1664 No. Virginia St. should be as lean as an
Reno, NV 89557 equation."
PH (775) 784-6500 x273 -- David Quammen
FX (775) 784-1328 (paraphrasing Russell)
rickand@unr.edu