[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Graphing the Bergstrom and McAfee Journal Pricing Data
I don't wish to engage the substance of this debate, but I will clarify
one business point.
* There are three, not two, structural categories. A journal publisher
can remain independent (category #1).
* A journal publisher can license rights, usually for a limited period of
time, to a larger publisher. That larger publisher essentially becomes THE
publisher: setting prices, etc.
* The third category is when the journal publisher forms a distribution
(not publishing) relationship with a larger publisher. The larger
publisher makes its operations available to the smaller
publisher--essentially it sells services. But the smaller publisher still
controls pricing and many aspects of marketing. Such distribution
agreements often have shorter terms than full-fledged publishing
agreements. Apparently Lisa Dittrich's organization has a distribution
agreement with a larger publisher.
None of this challenges the core of Bergstrom and McAfee's findings, as
far as I can tell: Most of the time most commercial operations charge
more than most not-for-profit organizations. I don't think this is a
startling claim.
Joe Esposito