[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "Governing law" in license agreements
In the license agreements that I negotiate on behalf of the
consortium I include language to the effect that the applicable
law will be the "laws of the state of the subscribing
institution." This covers all of the subscribers and takes care
of the state institutions that cannot subject themselves to the
laws of another jurisdiction. With some non-U.S. based vendors
and publishers we have compromised and agreed to apply the laws
of the state of NY. We also will opt to remain silent rather than
subject member libraries in 30+ states to the laws of the state
of the publisher/vendor. I have always found vendor/publishers
willing to at least accept silence as a compromise. Good luck!
Cheers,
Tracy L. Thompson, Executive Director
New England Law Library Consortium (NELLCO)
www.nellco.org
603-357-3385 (voice)
603-357-2075 (fax)
tracy.thompson@yale.edu
At 10:33 PM 2/6/2006, you wrote:
Can you share your approach to clauses regarding "governing law"
or jurisdiction in license agreements you have in place with
database suppliers? It seems that in most cases a standard
license agreement identifies that the governing law is that of
the state where the vendor is located. Do you usually accept
this provision as presented? Or do you ask vendors to make
changes to this type of clause? And if so, what type of changes
do you request in this regard?
Thank you in advance for your input,
Rogelio Hinojosa
Acquisitions/Serials
Texas A&M International University