[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Maximising research access vs. minimizing copy-editing errors
Apologies for copying the wrong link. You will find the BMJ data
at http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/aboutsite/visitorstats.shtml - look
at the 'Annual Online Questionnaire'
Sally Morris, Chief Executive
Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers
South House, The Street, Clapham, Worthing, West Sussex BN13 3UU, UK
Email: sally.morris@alpsp.org
[mailto:owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu] On Behalf Of Sally Morris
(ALPSP)
Sent: 28 July 2006 00:36
To: Liblicense
Subject: Re: Maximising research access vs. minimizing copy-editing errors
Maybe we need more information about the actual size of the
access problem. Publishers tend, I think, to report fairly low
levels of 'turnaways' - those who try to access full text but
can't. If any publishers reading this can contribute figures,
that would be useful.
A very, very small percentage of accesses to BMJ's free
research articles are from patients and the general public;
see
http://miranda.ingentaconnect.com/vl=6377737/cl=15/tt=885/ini=alpsp/nw=1/fm=
docpdf/rpsv/cw/alpsp/09531513/v16n3/s1/p163.
In OUP's recent study of NAR
(http://www.oxfordjournals.org/news/oa_report.pdf) only eight
to twelve percent of increased access was attributable to its
going OA; far, far more was due to opening up to search engine
crawlers.
Sally Morris, Chief Executive
Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers
Email: sally.morris@alpsp.org