I personally believe that FTE-based pricing is quite harmful to the library community for the following reasons: Use is not necessarily tied to the institution's FTE. Growing campuses are penalized because the price continues to increase, but the users of the resource may not be growing in the same way. If anything, I think database pricing should be a flat rate or flat rate plus some factor for high use. Stefanie Stefanie Wittenbach Assistant Dean, Collections John Peace Library The University of Texas at San Antonio San Antonio, TX 78249-0671 stefanie.wittenbach@utsa.edu
****
[mailto:owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu] On Behalf Of Porzio, Steve
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 6:31 PM
To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Subject: FTE-based pricing
The American Statistical Association (ASA) is considering a change from its current flat-rate charge for web access to its journals to a tiered, FTE-based pricing structure. I am seeking librarians familiar with various journal pricing structures who would be willing to answer a few questions and give me their general thoughts on this potential change. We strongly wish to avoid harming relations with our library patrons and would much prefer to collaborate with those who purchase our journals. If you are willing to provide input, please contact me at steve@amstat.org.
The ASA is, among many other things, a non-profit publisher of statistical journals. More info may be found at www.amstat.org/publications.
***************************
Stephen Porzio
Associate Executive Director and
Director of Operations
American Statistical Association
Alexandria, Virginia 22314-1943
www.amstat.org
********************************* Tracy L. Thompson, Executive Director New England Law Library Consortium (NELLCO) www.nellco.org 603-357-3385 (voice) 603-357-2075 (fax) tracy.thompson@yale.edu