[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
platforms that work and cost little
An open source publishing platform (OJS) in use by over 800
journals (a reasonable estimate by PKP itself - not all journals
use the software exactly as it comes "out of the box") implies
stability and usability, to respond to Anthony Watkinson's
concerns. For these same reasons, Scholarly Exchange chose it as
its initial publishing platform and has plans to include other
options as they mature. Three of our board of directors have had
extensive experience developing applications of this sort, and
all three have confidence in several of the newly emerging and
fully featured reviewing-and-publishing platforms. Why
commercial publishers do not is inexplicable.
While some of the journals that SE supports are start-ups, others
have a longer history and are in the process of converting a
large quantity of back issues. One new journal received so much
attention that a commercial publisher already tried to buy it and
lock it behind a financial firewall, a move the editor rejected
summarily.
The no-risk approach to starting a journal has appealed to a both
universities and learned societies, including Monterey Institute,
Harvard University, McGill University, North Carolina State
University, Kaduna State University (Nigeria), Universidad
Complutense de Madrid, Universidad de Murcia, Liverpool John
Moores University and the International Society for Disease
Surveillance. We applaud their innovative and independent spirit
and hope to help others pursue this ultra-low-cost path to Open
Access publishing.
Julian Fisher, MD
Managing Director
Scholarly Exchange, Inc., a 501 (c) 3 public charity