[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: second-hand ownership
Dear Kevin, Pippa, Linda and Sandy:
Yes, my (with a co-author from Chile) paper was about Sir Isaac
Newton's universal calendar and was published by Notes and
Records of the Royal Society in 59 (3) Sept 2005 issue. We made a
transcript of several Newton's handwritings and displayed several
pages of his computations. [Of course our main goal was analysis
of Newton's text and the statistical method behind his
computations.]
These documents from Jerusalem were never published previously.
They were bequested by someone A. Sh. Yahuda to JNUL in 1951 and
after prolonged court proceedings initiated by his family still
reached Jerusalem in 1969. It is my understnading that JNUL owns
complete rights to these papers. (Yahuda himself bought them at
Sotheby's 1936 or immediately after).
This was an agreement between me and JNUL - below:
................................................................................
May 10, 2005
Dr. Ari Belenkiy
Mathematics Department
Bar-Ilan University
Ramat Gan 52900
Dear Dr. Belenkiy,
We hereby give you permission to reproduce the images of four
pages of Newton's manuscripts from the Jewish National and
University Library's Newton Papers 24 for your article, which
will appear in the Notes and Records of the Royal Society of
London. Appropriate credit should be given to the JNUL.
Yours sincerely,
Rivka Plesser
Director
Department of Manuscripts and Archives
.................................................................
Let me note that the manuscripts are known among Newton scholars
as "Yahuda mns" but JNUL probably prefers name "Newton" by
obvious reasons.
I do remember that I signed a standard agreement with NRRS giving
them all the rights where was a provision that all issues
involving the reproduction of documents I had to resolve with the
owners on my own.
While JNUL's depury director (Mrs R. Duke) already contacted me
after my query to this list I am still interested to find out
what are the legal issues involved.
I am also a bit distrurbed by her language - "for commercial use"
- since our publication did not have any commercial targets
except for the obvious "academic status" issues involved.
Thanks again to everyone who has already responded.
Ari Belenkiy