[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Plan B for NIH Public Access Mandate: A Deposit Mandate

To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Subject: Re: Plan B for NIH Public Access Mandate: A Deposit Mandate
From: "atanu garai" <atanugarai.lists@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 16:56:07 EDT
Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu

The legal aspect depends on how one interprets it. This can be 
interpreted as a systematic attempt to disseminate content, 
otherwise deemed untenable legally to a large number audience, 
worldwide.

Atanu Garai

2008/9/17 Stevan Harnad <amsciforum@gmail.com>

> And what legal aspect do you have in mind, when it comes to
> authors responding to individual eprint requests for their own
> articles?

Prev by Date: Re: Plan B for NIH Public Access Mandate: A Deposit Mandate
Next by Date: The end of book publishing as we know it?
Previous by thread: Re: Plan B for NIH Public Access Mandate: A Deposit Mandate
Next by thread: Re: Plan B for NIH Public Access Mandate: A Deposit Mandate
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread