[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: New US Bill re. Copyright/Federal Funding
Many publishers would agree that the results of publicly funded
research should be available to the public free of charge but
that these 'results' are the authors' original version of the
manuscript before peer review, copy-editing, reference linking,
typesetting etc. The authors' original version also does not
benefit from association with a journal brand.
If scholarship wants to benefit from the value added by
publishers - whether those operating a predominantly gold OA
business model, a predominantly subscription model or any other
business model as yet not even though of, then it needs to be
paid for.
Taking away the ability for publishers to recover their
investment and, yes, in some cases make a profit will only serve
to stifle innovation and investment in scholarly communication
and IMHO is not in the best interests of academia or of the
public at large.
Ian Russell
ALPSP
-----Original Message-----
[mailto:owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu] On Behalf Of Linda Hopkins
Sent: 20 September 2008 03:20
To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Subject: RE: New US Bill re. Copyright/Federal Funding
Dear All:
I apologize for the emotionalism of my earlier comments.
Whose rights to protect when it comes to scientific research is
of course a complicated question. When I worked as a
presidential advisor, the trend was definitely towards making
access and practical use of knowledge developed by federal funds
available to as many people as possible. I believe in that
policy.
I recognize that publishing houses want to make money on their
publications and if Disney and Fox News want to do this, fine.
That's entertainment.
But the inherent value of scientific research is that a wide
variety of learned experts read and discuss it. Since the
purpose of federal funds for research is to advance science,
technology, health care, and better standards of living, I
believe that granting a free irrevocable, world-wide license to
the government to display and copy articles is nothing more than
fulfilling the purposes of the grant/contract.
Linda Hopkins
Linda K. Hopkins, Attorney at Law
Intelliware Int'l Law Firm
Roseville, MN 55113
Email: lin.hopkins@hotmail.com