Re: Hoax Article Accepted by OA Bentham Journal

["B.G. Sloan" <bgsloan2@yahoo.com>]

Thomas Krichel writes: "...we all know that peer review is a 
vague concept to the point of being useless."

Really? I don't mean to sound naive or skeptical. Can Thomas 
Krichel point us to some empirical studies that show peer review 
is useless?

Bernie Sloan
Sora Associates

--- On Fri, 6/12/09, Thomas Krichel <krichel@openlib.org> wrote:

From: Thomas Krichel <krichel@openlib.org>
Subject: Hoax Article Accepted by OA Bentham Journal
To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Date: Friday, June 12, 2009, 9:39 PM

B.G. Sloan writes

> http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6664637.html

Same old. Bentham Science have been dismissed as a junk publisher
quite a few times on this list and similar fora, and we all know
that peer review is a vague concept to the point of being
useless.

Cheers,

Thomas Krichel