8.0       SYNTHESIS AND COMMENTARY AREA

 

 

DEFINITION:           

This category provides an evaluation of the life, significance, roles, activities, and contributions of the described person as deter­mined by the entity responsible for the de­scrip­tion.

 

DISCUSSION:         

Entities maintaining biographical information often record evaluative and interpre­tive information that describes how the individual related to areas that the entity has collect­ing or other interests in and how the person functioned within his or her environ­ment.  While descriptive information recorded in other areas might provide much of this type of interpretive knowledge for those particu­lar areas, this category provides an opportu­nity to record a summary statement that pro­vides this evalua­tion for the person as a whole.

 

            >>Purpose:               

Archival repositories and related institu­tions are often one of the few entities with an ongoing interest in the documenta­tion of a particular individual and with ac­cess to a wide range of primary and secondary sources about his or her history.  As such, it is in a good posi­tion to provide a his­torical per­spec­tive on the life and activ­i­ties of the person.  This is especially true for those individuals that have not been or are unlike­ly to be the subject of in-depth scholarly research.  This synthesis of information, gathered from a variety of sources and per­spectives and recorded in a commentary, may highlight trends and issues that cut across chronological periods or specific areas of personal activity, as segregated in this descriptive structure.  It also serves as a record of the entity's own perspective on the significance and role of the person, espe­cially as that perspective provides a frame­work for how the entity dealt with the per­son's records.

 

            >>Nature:                  

As an evaluative piece of information, this cate­gory is more subject to dispute than many other categories in the biographical de­scrip­tion.  Vary­ing interpretations will often lead to commentar­ies that conflict in signif­icant ways.  It is essential that this cate­gory include attribution information that identifies the source of the commentary.

 

SOURCES:              

Information in this category will generally be developed by the entity responsible for the bio­graphical description through back­ground research while preparing to survey, appraise, or process papers of the person, or from reference experience in support of re­search into the person's life and activities.

 

USES:                       

By documenting the entity's own perceptions of the significance and role of the described individual, the information in this catego­ry can serve to illuminate why the entity treat­ed the papers of the person as it did or why it gave this person the particular emphasis that it did in its vari­ous programs.  This category can also serve as a preliminary framework within which a researcher can begin to understand the individual and within which he or she can relate individual pieces of descriptive information.

 

ACCESS:                 

Most of the information in this category would probably be recorded in unstructured text and one would not need to retrieve it directly through structured access points or free text searching.  Because of its subjec­tive nature, however, the nature of the in­formation in this category and its attribu­tion must be apparent whenever it is dis­played.

 

TERMINOLOGY:

 

EXAMPLES:

 

INTERCHANGE:    

Attribution must be continually associated with this information whenever it is ex­changed.

 

RELATIONSHIPS:  

Where the circumstances of a particular event, activity, or status are recorded with regard to other categories of biographical information, they will often present the same concerns about attribution and interpretation that this category does.

 

PRACTICE:

 

ISSUES:       

This category must be carefully constructed as a synthesis and commentary and not merely as a summary statement of facts recorded in other areas of the biographical descrip­tion.

 

The purpose of this category must be careful­ly explained to archival repositories and is likely to raise questions about the propriety of the archivist or the repository engaging in this type of interpretive activity in the context of biographical description.  It must be pointed out that it already happens and is an essential part of the repository's priori­ty setting and allocation of effort, and feeds directly into appraisal decisions.  As such, it needs to be recorded and labeled explicitly as the repository's rationale for its actions.

 

 

 

           

 

            ISSUES: